For what it’s worth

For what it’s worth: it’s never too late to be whoever you want to be. There’s no time limit. You can change or stay the same, there are no rules to this thing. We can make the best or the worst of it. I hope you make the best of it. And I hope you see things that startle you. I hope you feel things you never felt before. I hope you meet people with a different point of view. I hope you live a life you’re proud of. If you find that you’re not, I hope you have the strength to start all over again.

THE HEATED ACT of sex often expunges judgment, pushing the participants into territory they hadn’t previously contemplated. The speed at which one transgresses, the urge to reach oblivion, the glamour of violence, the arbitrary and shifting distinction between acts repulsive and attractive—all these aspects that existed only in sex are now re-created through Internet porn. You could be poking around for some no-frills Web clips of amateur couples doing it missionary style, but easily and rapidly you slide into footage of two women simultaneously working their crotches on opposing ends of a double-sided dildo, and then all of a sudden you’re at a teenage-fisting Web site. All of this happens maybe by accident—those pop-ups can be misleading—or maybe, and more likely, it happens because in that moment it’s arousing, whether you like it or not. Consuming Internet porn, then, mimics many of the sensations found in sex. It’s overpowering and immediate; it is the brute force of male sexuality, unmasked and untethered.
From the Atlantic’s must-read of the day, Hard Core. (via braiker)

(via gq)

gq:

Welcome to Congress, Republicans! Here’s Your Freshman Orientation Map
The first thing you’ll notice about our nation’s capital is that  it has lots of black people. Don’t be alarmed—they live here! Feel free  to engage them, but always remember: Most of them are Democrats. 
1. K Street: “Grass-Roots Funding Avenue.”2. Museum of Natural History: “Museum of Evolutionary Theory.”3. White House: “Kenyan Presidential Palace.”4. National Mall: There are no food courts here. Or Cinnabons.  Yet.5. State Department: “Comintern.”6. Union Station: “Socialized Transit Station.”7. C Street House: The C stands for Christ. And mistresses.8. The Palm: “The People’s Steak House.” (Recommended: The  People’s Prime Bone-In Filet Mignon for $56.)9. Apex Nightclub: Recommended for late-night fact-finding  missions by straight male members who are very, very opposed to the  spread of the gay agenda.10. Massachusetts Avenue: “Street of Countries Waiting to Be Bombed.”11. Verizon Center: Where white people and black people come  together.
[Text by Stephen Sherrill]

gq:

Welcome to Congress, Republicans! Here’s Your Freshman Orientation Map

The first thing you’ll notice about our nation’s capital is that it has lots of black people. Don’t be alarmed—they live here! Feel free to engage them, but always remember: Most of them are Democrats.

1. K Street: “Grass-Roots Funding Avenue.”
2. Museum of Natural History:
“Museum of Evolutionary Theory.”
3. White House:
“Kenyan Presidential Palace.”
4. National Mall: There are no food courts here. Or Cinnabons. Yet.
5. State Department:
“Comintern.”
6. Union Station: “Socialized Transit Station.”
7. C Street House: The C stands for Christ. And mistresses.
8. The Palm: “The People’s Steak House.” (Recommended: The People’s Prime Bone-In Filet Mignon for $56.)
9. Apex Nightclub: Recommended for late-night fact-finding missions by straight male members who are very, very opposed to the spread of the gay agenda.
10. Massachusetts Avenue: “Street of Countries Waiting to Be Bombed.”
11. Verizon Center: Where white people and black people come together.

[Text by Stephen Sherrill]

I’ve been listening to William Fitzsimmons all day

The most beautiful people we have known are those who have known defeat, known suffering, known struggle, known loss, and have found their way out of the depths. These persons have an appreciation, a sensitivity, and an understanding of life that fills them with compassion, gentleness, and a deep loving concern. Beautiful people do not just happen.
Elizabeth Kubler Cross  (via theporcelainballerina)

(via thewaltzoftheflowers)

i mean that from my heart cause you make me feel good as a person

Development

We die to each other daily. 
What we know of other people 
Is only our memory of the moments 
During which we knew them. And they have changed since then. 
To pretend that they and we are the same 
Is a useful and convenient social convention 
Which must sometimes broken. We must also remember 
That at every meeting we are meeting a stranger. 
T.S. Eliot

Your #

Related to the reblogged post below… 

I saw Blue Valentine during winter break and one thing that stands out to me now thinking back is the scene when the character Michelle Williams plays responded to a question in the abortion clinic about how many sexual partners she had in her past. First of all, I question the relevance of this question and think that there should be legitimate reasons for asking something so personal and preparation for how the answers will be interpreted. 

To be completely honest, my initial response was disgust, then pity. My thoughts were… you were intimate with that many people, shared something of yourself with that many, but how many were actually deserving? I felt sorry for her. But I feel like there’s something wrong with my response, that it assumes she went searching in the wrong places, that she was a passive recipient, that the more you share with others who did nothing to earn your adoration, your affection, the more it diminishes your value and self-worth….

lenachen:

Despite having blogged rather prolifically about pretty much every other aspect of my sex life, I haven’t ever publicly admitted my “number”. Readers have asked several times over the years, but I’ve always been hesitant to reveal what is perhaps the only secret left in my arsenal. I recently came clean in Marie Claire’s February issue, which profiles five women and their “numbers”. (Spoiler: in case the above photo from the story didn’t already tip you off, I’ve slept with 30 men.)
Why didn’t I discuss this before? While I can intellectually acknowledge the existence of double  standards, I think in practice, it’s a lot easier to deny that one is a  “slut” than to deny the entire concept of sluthood. Blogging about sex forced me to confront the personal becoming political at a much earlier age than other women, but although I write about gender norms and progressive sexuality, I find it hard to practice what I preach against the steady stream of slut-shaming and moral judgment. But even if it makes me squirmish, it’s time to put my money where my mouth is.
I do, however, have the following disclaimer: given all the work I’ve done debunking the concept of virginity and arguing for a more inclusive stance toward sexuality, I’m conflicted about the entire idea of a “number” in the first place. I’ve never  believed that it makes much sense to privilege vaginal intercourse over  other types of sexual acts, especially since that discounts the  experiences of those who diverge from the heterosexual norm. (And as  illustrated by the story of Carlin Ross, another subject in Marie  Claire, not everyone who does diverge necessarily identifies as gay or  bisexual, but may nonetheless view same-sex encounters as equally  satisfying and formative experiences.) So while being honest about our “number” might be a good start toward becoming comfortable with our sexuality, I think it’s wiser to encourage women to talk more openly about their sexual histories in general, whether or not the acts involved include that narrow yet murky concept of “sex”.

lenachen:

Despite having blogged rather prolifically about pretty much every other aspect of my sex life, I haven’t ever publicly admitted my “number”. Readers have asked several times over the years, but I’ve always been hesitant to reveal what is perhaps the only secret left in my arsenal. I recently came clean in Marie Claire’s February issue, which profiles five women and their “numbers”. (Spoiler: in case the above photo from the story didn’t already tip you off, I’ve slept with 30 men.)

Why didn’t I discuss this before? While I can intellectually acknowledge the existence of double standards, I think in practice, it’s a lot easier to deny that one is a “slut” than to deny the entire concept of sluthood. Blogging about sex forced me to confront the personal becoming political at a much earlier age than other women, but although I write about gender norms and progressive sexuality, I find it hard to practice what I preach against the steady stream of slut-shaming and moral judgment. But even if it makes me squirmish, it’s time to put my money where my mouth is.

I do, however, have the following disclaimer: given all the work I’ve done debunking the concept of virginity and arguing for a more inclusive stance toward sexuality, I’m conflicted about the entire idea of a “number” in the first place. I’ve never believed that it makes much sense to privilege vaginal intercourse over other types of sexual acts, especially since that discounts the experiences of those who diverge from the heterosexual norm. (And as illustrated by the story of Carlin Ross, another subject in Marie Claire, not everyone who does diverge necessarily identifies as gay or bisexual, but may nonetheless view same-sex encounters as equally satisfying and formative experiences.) So while being honest about our “number” might be a good start toward becoming comfortable with our sexuality, I think it’s wiser to encourage women to talk more openly about their sexual histories in general, whether or not the acts involved include that narrow yet murky concept of “sex”.

Listology

  • children’s books 
  • hand kisses 
  • finding what was once lost 
  • wishing you wouldn’t give up on loving me
  • boyfriends who ask you if you would ever get a breast augmentation…
  • tissue paper 
  • dried, peeling glue 

Cavalier

When I was in elementary school, I had a neighbor with two big German Shepards. We would ride them and pretend they were horsies. When that wasn’t enough, we would use wooden sticks to build jumps and got on our hands and knees to become horses ourselves. I don’t know when I first fell in love with horses. I just remember collecting horse figurines, reading my book on all the different breeds of horses every night before falling asleep, asking my parents to go on those cheesy horseback riding tours wherever we went on vacation, and jealously eavesdropping on the group of girls at my middle school who did dressage. After watching Seabiscuit, I read and re-read the book, looked on ebay for jockey outfits, and was heartbroken when I realized I was too tall to ever have a realistic future as one. 

I love this pictures of wild horses. I only grew up seeing horses with heavy saddles and mouthpieces, exhausted from being worked all day, from being obedient. They are most beautiful in their true form, free to gallop and wander with grace. If I had to think of an image or symbol of how I conceptualize femininity, I see this vision of wild horses. There is something incredibly sensual and strong about them. 

Yet horses in literature and history have been associated with masculinity (conquest, raids, colonialism, commerce). Maybe because they’re stubborn, grunt a lot, and are actually very fearful and run in the face of danger… On a more serious note, I’m interested in the distinction between horses in the wild as exuding femininity, while horses conquered and coopted by a master and his agendas represent virility and male dominance. Is this perhaps because man alone has little power or ability to subject others to voicelessness or helplessness, but needs something relationally in opposition, something to conquer, someone to exploit in order to establish control.

The image of a man riding a horse, breaking its spirit to do his will perfectly captures the way I think about gender exploitation, in which women’s energies and power are expended, often unnoticed and unacknowledged, usually to benefit men by releasing them for work that is considered more important (ex: politics, business, law, medicine, list goes on). Work that women do, which actually isn’t considered work but as more of an obligation or expected inherent capacity of being woman, such as childcare, cooking, cleaning, taking care of the elderly and sick family members, frees men from these responsibilities necessary for daily life and gives them the opportunity to seek and further self-development in socially respected ways. Men’s ability to be a part of “progress” and “development” is only possible because it’s built on the backs and burdens of women. Thus, oppression occurs through a steady process of the transfer of the results of the labor of one social group to benefit another. 

Poetry is Not a Luxury (Audre Lorde)

“Your silence will not protect you.”

The quality of light by which we scrutinize our lives has direct bearing upon the product which we live, and upon the changes which we hope to bring about through those lives. It is within this light that we form those ideas by which we pursue our magic and make it realized. This is poetry as illumination, for it is through poetry that we give name to those ideas which are, until the poem, nameless and formless-about to be birthed, but already felt. That distillation of experience from which true poetry springs births thought as dream births concept, as feeling births idea, as knowledge births (precedes) understanding.

As we learn to bear the intimacy of scrutiny, and to flourish within it, as we learn to use the products of that scrutiny for power within our living, those fears which rule our lives and form our silences begin to lose their control over us.

For each of us as women, there is a dark place within where hidden and growing our true spirit rises, “Beautiful and tough as chestnut/stanchions against our nightmare of weakness” and of impotence.

These places of possibility within ourselves are dark because they are ancient and hidden; they have survived and grown strong through darkness. Within these deep places, each one of us holds an incredible reserve of creativity and power, of unexamined and unrecorded emotion and feeling. The woman’s place of power within each of us is neither white nor surface; it is dark, it is ancient, and it is deep.

When we view living, in the european mode, only as a problem to be solved, we then rely solely upon our ideas to make us free, for these were what the white fathers told us were precious.

But as we become more in touch with our own ancient, black, non-european view of living as a situation to be experienced and interacted with, we learn more and more to cherish our feelings, and to respect those hidden sources of our power from where true knowledge and therefore lasting action comes.

At this point in time, I believe that women carry within ourselves the possibility for fusion of these two approaches as keystone for survival, and we come closest to this combination in our poetry. I speak here of poetry as the revelation or distillation of experience, not the sterile word play that, too often, the white fathers distorted the word poetry to mean - in order to cover their desperate wish for imagination without insight.

For women, then, poetry is not a luxury. It is a vital necessity of our existence. It forms the quality of the light within which we predicate our hopes and dreams toward survival and change, first made into language, then into idea, then into more tangible action.

Poetry is the way we help give name to the nameless so it can be thought. The farthest external horizons of our hopes and fears are cobbled by our poems, carved from the rock experiences of our daily lives.

As they become known and accepted to ourselves, our feelings, and the honest exploration of them, become sanctuaries and fortresses and spawning grounds for the most radical and daring of ideas, the house of difference so necessary to change and the conceptualization of any meaningful action. Right now, I could name at least ten ideas I would have once found intolerable or incomprehensible and frightening, except as they came after dreams and poems. This is not idle fantasy, but the true meaning of “it feels right to me.” We can train ourselves to respect our feelings, and to discipline (transpose) them into a language that matches those feelings so they can be shared. And where that language does not yet exist, it is our poetry which helps to fashion it. Poetry is not only dream or vision, it is the skeleton architecture of our lives.

Possibility is neither forever nor instant. It is also not easy to sustain belief in its efficacy. We can sometimes work long and hard to establish one beachhead of real resistance to the deaths we are expected to live, only to have that beachhead assaulted or threatened by canards we have been socialized to fear, or by the withdrawal of those approvals that we have been warned to seek for safety. We see ourselves diminished or softened by the falsely benign accusations of childishness, of non-universality, of self-centeredness, of sensuality. And who asks the question: am I altering your aura, your ideas, your dreams, or am I merely moving you to temporary and reactive action? (Even the latter is no mean task, but one that must be rather seen within the context of a true alteration of the texture of our lives.)

The white fathers told us, I think therefore I am; and the black mothers in each of us-the poet-whispers in our dreams, I feel therefore I can be free. Poetry coins the language to express and charter this revolutionary awareness and demand, the implementation of that freedom. However, experience has taught us that the action in the now is also always necessary. Our children cannot dream unless they live, they cannot live unless they are nourished, and who else will feed them the real food without which their dreams will be no different from ours?

Sometimes we drug ourselves with dreams of new ideas. The head will save us. The brain alone will set us free. But there are no new ideas still waiting in the wings to save us as women, as human. There are only old and forgotten ones, new combinations, extrapolations and recognitions from within ourselves, along with the renewed courage to try them out. And we must constantly encourage ourselves and each other to attempt the heretical actions our dreams imply and some of our old ideas disparage. In the forefront of our move toward change, there is only our poetry to hint at possibility made real. Our poems formulate the implications of ourselves, what we feel within and dare make real (or bring action into accordance with), our fears, our hopes, our most cherished terrors.


For within structures defined by profit, by linear power, by institutional dehumanization, our feelings were not meant to survive. Kept around as unavoidable adjuncts or pleasant pastimes, feelings were meant to kneel to thought as we were meant to kneel to men. But women have survived. As poets. And there are no new pains. We have felt them all already. We have hidden that fact in the same place where we have hidden our power. They lie in our dreams, and it is our dreams that point the way to freedom. They are made realizable through our poems that give us the strength and courage to see, to feel, to speak, and to dare.

If what we need to dream, to move our spirits most deeply and directly toward and through promise, is a luxury, then we have given up the core-the fountain-of our power, our womanness; we have give up the future of our worlds.

For there are no new ideas. There are only new ways of making them felt, of examining what our ideas really mean (feel like) on Sunday morning at 7 AM, after brunch, during wild love, making war, giving birth; while we suffer the old longings, battle the old warnings and fears of being silent and impotent and alone, while tasting our new possibilities and strengths.

On Self-Respect (Joan Didion)

Joan Didon’s “The Year of Magical Thinking,” is one of my favorites.

Once, in a dry season, I wrote in large letters across two pages of a notebook that innocence ends when one is stripped of the delusion that one likes oneself. Although now, some years later, I marvel that a mind on the outs with itself should have nonetheless made painstaking record of its every tremor, I recall with embarrassing clarity the flavor of those particular ashes. It was a mater of misplaced self-respect.

I had not been elected to Phi Beta Kappa. This failure could scarcely have been more predictable or less ambiguous (I simply did not have the grades), but I was unnerved by it; I had somehow thought myself a kind of academic Raskolnikov, curiously exempt from the cause-effect relationships which hampered others. Although even the humorless nineteen-year-old that I was must have recognized that the situation lacked real tragic stature, the day that I did to make Phi Beta kappa nonetheless marked the end of something, and innocence may well be the word for it. I lost the conviction that lights would always turn green for me, the pleasant certainty that those rather passive virtues which had won me approval as a child automatically guaranteed me not only Phi Beta Kappa keys but happiness, honor, and the love of a good man; lost a certain touching faith in the totem power of good manners, clean hair, and proved competence on the Stanford-Binet scale. To such doubtful amulets had my self-respect been pinned, and I faced myself that day with the nonplussed apprehension of someone who has come across a vampire and has no crucifix at hand.

Although to be driven back upon oneself is an uneasy affair at best, rather like trying to cross a border with borrowed credentials, it seems to me now the one condition necessary to the beginnings of real self-respect. Most of our platitudes notwithstanding, self-deception remains the most difficult deception. The tricks that work on others count for nothing in that well-lit back alley where one keeps assignations with oneself; no winning smiles will do here, no prettily drawn lists of good intentions. One shuffles flashily but in vain through ones’ marked cards the kindness done for the wrong reason, the apparent triumph which involved no real effort, the seemingly heroic act into which one had been shamed. The dismal fact is that self-respect has nothing to do with the approval of others – who we are, after all, deceived easily enough; has nothing to do with reputation, which, as Rhett Butler told Scarlett O’Hara, is something people with courage can do without.

To do without self-respect, on the other hand, is to be an unwilling audience of one to an interminable documentary that deals one’s failings, both real and imagined, with fresh footage spliced in for every screening. There’s the glass you broke in anger, there’s the hurt on X’s face; watch now, this next scene, the night Y came back from Houston, see how you muff this one. To live without self-respect is to lie awake some night, beyond the reach of warm milk, the Phenobarbital, and the sleeping hand on the coverlet, counting up the sins of commissions and omission, the trusts betrayed, the promises subtly broken, the gifts irrevocably wasted through sloth or cowardice, or carelessness. However long we postpone it, we eventually lie down alone in that notoriously uncomfortable bed, the one we make ourselves. Whether or not we sleep in it depends, of course, on whether or not we respect ourselves.

To protest that some fairly improbably people, some people who could not possibly respect themselves, seem to sleep easily enough is to miss the point entirely, as surely as those people miss it who think that self-respect has necessarily to do with not having safety pins in one’s underwear. There is a common superstition that “self-respect” is a kind of charm against snakes, something that keeps those who have it locked in some unblighted Eden, out of strange beds, ambivalent conversations, and trouble in general. It does not at all. It has nothing to do with the face of things, but concerns instead a separate peace, a private reconciliation. Although the careless, suicidal Julian English in Appointment in Samara and the careless, incurably dishonest Jordan Baker in The Great Gatsby seem equally improbably candidates for self-respect, Jordan Baker had it, Julian English did not. With that genius for accommodation more often seen in women than men, Jordan took her own measure, made her own peace, avoided threats to that peace: “I hate careless people,” she told Nick Carraway. “It takes two to make an accident.”

Like Jordan Baker, people with self-respect have the courage of their mistakes. They know the price of things. If they choose to commit adultery, they do not then go running, in an access of bad conscience, to receive absolution from the wronged parties; nor do they complain unduly of the unfairness, the undeserved embarrassment, of being named co-respondent. In brief, people with self-respect exhibit a certain toughness, a kind of mortal nerve; they display what was once called character, a quality which, although approved in the abstract, sometimes loses ground to other, more instantly negotiable virtues. The measure of its slipping prestige is that one tends to think of it only in connection with homely children and United States senators who have been defeated, preferably in the primary, for reelection. Nonetheless, character – the willingness to accept responsibility for one’s own life – is the source from which self-respect springs.

Self-respect is something that our grandparents, whether or not they had it, knew all about. They had instilled in them, young, a certain discipline, the sense that one lives by doing things one does not particularly want to do, by putting fears and doubts to one side, by weighing immediate comforts against the possibility of larger, even intangible, comforts. It seemed to the nineteenth century admirable, but not remarkable, that Chinese Gordon put on a clean white suit and held Khartoum against the Mahdi; it did not seem unjust that the way to free land in California involved death and difficulty and dirt. In a diary kept during the winter of 1846, an emigrating twelve-yaer-old named Narcissa Cornwall noted coolly: “Father was busy reading and did not notice that the house was being filled with strange Indians until Mother spoke out about it.” Even lacking any clue as to what Mother said, one can scarcely fail to be impressed by the entire incident: the father reading, the Indians filing in, the mother choosing the words that would not alarm, the child duly recording the event and noting further that those particular Indians were not, “fortunately for us,” hostile. Indians were simply part of the donnee.

In one guise or another, Indians always are. Again, it is a question of recognizing that anything worth having has its price. People who respect themselves are willing to accept the risk that the Indians will be hostile, that the venture will go bankrupt, that the liaison may not turn out to be one in which every day is a holiday because you’re married to me. They are willing to invest something of themselves; they may not play at all, but when they do play, they know the odds.

That kind of self-respect is a discipline, a habit of mind that can never be faked but can be developed, trained, coaxed forth. It was once suggested to me that, as an antidote to crying, I put my had in a paper bag. As it happens, there is a sound physiological reason, something to do with oxygen, for doing exactly that, but the psychological effect alone is incalculable: it is difficult bin the extreme to continue fancying oneself Cathy in Wuthering Heights with ones head in a Food Fair bag. There is a similar case for all the small disciplines, unimportant in themselves; imagine maintaining any kind of swoon, commiserative or carnal, in a cold shower.

But those small disciplines are valuable only insofar as they represent larger ones. To say that Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton is not to say that Napoleon might have been saved by a crash program in cricket; to give formal dinners in the rain forest would be pointless did not the candlelight flickering on the liana call forth deeper, stronger disciplines, values instilled long before. It is a kind of ritual, helping us to remember who and what we are. In order to remember it, one must have known it.

To have that sense of one’s intrinsic worth which constitutes self-respect is potentially to have everything: the ability to discriminate, to love and to remain indifferent. To lack it is to be locked within oneself, paradoxically incapable of either love or indifference. If we do not respect ourselves, we are the one hand forced to despise those who have so few resources as to consort with us, so little perception as to remain blind to our fatal weaknesses. On the other, we are peculiarly in thrall to everyone we see, curiously determined to live out – since our self-image is untenable – their false notion of us. We flatter ourselves by thinking this compulsion to please others an attractive trait: a gist for imaginative empathy, evidence of our willingness to give. Of course I will play Francesca to your Paolo, Helen Keller to anyone’s Annie Sullivan; no expectation is too misplaced, no role too ludicrous. At the mercy of those we cannot but hold in contempt, we play roles doomed to failure before they are begun, each defeat generating fresh despair at the urgency of divining and meting the next demand made upon us.

It is the phenomenon sometimes called “alienation from self.” In its advanced stages, we no longer answer the telephone, because someone might want something; that we could say no without drowning in self-reproach is an idea alien to this game. Every encounter demands to much, tears the nerves, drains the will, and the specter of something as small as an unanswered letter arouses such disproportionate guilt that answering it becomes out of the question. To assign unanswered letters their proper weight, to free us from the expectations of others, to give us back to ourselves – there lies the great, the singular power of self-respect. Without it, one eventually discovers the final turn of the screw: one runs away to find oneself, and finds no one at home.

21 Things I Love About You

To love oneself is the beginning of a life-long romance. – O. Wilde

but they say that you’re really not somebody until somebody else loves you…

Twenty years worth of evidence that every act of creation begins with an act of deconstruction.

Here’s to 21 years of stubbornness, surrender, fragmentation, wholeness, being captive, captivation, deprivation, overindulgence, truth-seeking, blindsidedness, acts of faith, and increasingly, guilt-free sweetness. (oh and polka-dotted swimsuits)

the private is the political

view archive



Ask me anything